Username: 
Password: 
 

• About on-line access  • Apply for UserID

RADIL Introduces Pinworm by PCR Testing
11.19.2009

In the past, in order to accurately determine the presence of pinworms in an animal has required a post-mortem direct exam.  With the introduction of RADIL's new PCR assay which tests for both Syphacia obvelata and Aspiculuris tetraptera, antemortem testing can now be performed with highly accurate results.  RADIL's Pinworm PCR assay is nearly as sensitive as the direct exam and has the advantage that the animal does not need to be euthanized for evaluation.  In studies, it was also more sensitive than either of the two antemortem tests (tape test and fecal float).

Pinworm by PCR evaluation will be available beginning December 1, 2009 as part of the Mouse Basic , Mouse Comprehensive and Rat Basic Fecal Panels, as a Helicobacter & Pinworm panel, or as a stand-alone assay.  For more information and pricing, please click here. 

( for more info click here )
MFI2 - The next generation in serology testing
11.19.2009

At this year's National AALAS Meeting in Denver, Colorado, RADIL introduced a breakthrough serologic testing technology that will offer clients an increased level of results confidence for the most prevalent mouse and rat agents.  MFI2 represents an advanced approach to serologic monitoring for laboratory animal pathogens, providing the highest level of diagnostic accuracy available.   By evaluating multiple antigens for each agent, primary and confirmatory testing now occur at the same time, saving time and increasing the predictive value of the final results.  Clients will begin seeing multiple antigens reported on case reports as of December 1, 2009.

For more information regarding MFI2, please visit the Serology section of this site.

( for more info click here )
Animal Identification SOP

Animal identification is a critical component of the necropsy procedure. Identification of animals (or group of animals) is important to ensure that accurate information on the health status of each submitted animal is obtained. To facilitate accurate identification of animals we would like to offer the following suggestions for marking the animals.

  1. Animals of all coat colors may be marked on tails with different color permanent markers (Figure 1). A 2 mm band around the tail is preferable to prevent removal of mark by excessive grooming while in transit. It is best to use no more than 10 lines per animal. Avoid black markings on dark tailed mice; other colors such as blue, red and green work well for these mice.


    Figure 1
  2. If sending 20 or more animals that are ear tagged, ear punched or toe clipped in the same box, consider identifying groups of 10 mice with a secondary marking system. For example groups can be designated with different colored stripes along the length of the tail (Figure 2). This will aid in identification of animals whose primary means of identification has been damaged, lost or is difficult to interpret. The latter is not uncommon with many ear notching schemes.


    Figure 2

  3. In our experience, cardboard and plastic dividers are often not adequate at keeping animals separated during shipping. Occasionally the box may be damaged in shipping, allowing animals to move freely over or under dividers. Also, animals may chew through dividers. Therefore, it is beneficial to differentiate animals that are in the same box but separated by a divider by coat color or other markings.
  4. Regardless of the marking system, please describe the method used to identify animals on the submission form.
University of Missouri-Columbia
©2007 - Curators of the University of Missouri. All rights reserved. DMCA and other copyright information.
An equal opportunity/affirmative action institution.
design provided by Nine Plus One